The Government Communication Centre: life after the COI

DH rolling out anti-smoking 'health harm' drive
DH rolling out anti-smoking 'health harm' drive

As the COI shuts up shop, the new public ad structures, under the auspices of the Government Communication Centre, are under scrutiny.

CLICK HERE FOR THE BIG DEBATE: 'GOVERNMENT ADVERTISING SAVES THE COUNTRY MONEY'

It has been a long goodbye, but last week the COI shut its doors for good.

Its demise is well-documented; once the coalition government was installed, adspend - which had soared under Labour - was slashed in line with its much-vaunted austerity drive. Ministers reasoned that there was no need for the COI, and since last year has been winding down.

The Government Communication Centre (GCC), led by executive director of government communications Jenny Grey, will pick up some of the COI's duties, although the Cabinet Office has stressed that it is not a replacement.

The GCC comprises 150 people, but just 30 or so of those are in new posts to take over some of COI's former work. Industry commentators have voiced concerns that the knowledge and best-practice expertise championed by the COI will be lost, a charge denied by Gray.

Roster set-up

Under the new regime, departments will directly hire agencies selected for a roster by the Government Procurement Service. As part of another change, Whitehall marketers will work together in seven 'hubs' - groupings of departments and arm's-length bodies judged to have overlapping objectives.

Output will meet a 'government communications plan', formulated by the hubs and GCC. Grey says 'there is no golden number' on adspend but that it will not return to pre-2010 levels.

However, while spend was cut drastically in the first year of the coalition government, it is beginning to pick up again. Last week, the Department of Health (DH) rolled out its first major 'health-harm' anti-smoking drive for five years across TV and press.

DH marketing director Sheila Mitchell (right) says that departments will monitor the new way of working. 'In six months we will think about what works and what might have fallen through the gaps,' she adds.

In the debate below, which was hosted by Thinkbox last week, Mark Lund, former chief executive of the COI, conceded that not all public adspend was worthwhile.

'After six months we came to the conclusion that 60% of what we were doing was effective, 20% capable of improvement, and 20% was daft.'

The overhauled marketing structure is designed to vastly improve these statistics; there will be many interested parties watching to see whether it can.

 


 

THE BIG DEBATE: 'GOVERNMENT ADVERTISING SAVES THE COUNTRY MONEY'

The motion was proposed at the Debating Group event which took place last week at the House of Commons. Below is a summary of the arguments made.

PROPOSING THE MOTION

Stephen Woodford, chairman and chief executive, DDB

Mark Lund, co-founder and managing director, Now (former COI chief)

Woodford (right) began by bemoaning that the debate about government advertising focused on its benefits to the nation too often. While COI adspend has fallen drastically, under Labour it rocketed to an annual total of £540m. 'Compared with the costs to society of many of the behaviours they seek to influence, either positively or negatively, the adspends, even in the boom years, were trivial,' he said.

Such investment can improve society in many ways, he added, from reducing unnecessary deaths and injuries, improving health and well-being, through to improving the UK's GDP and Gross Happiness Index score.

Quoting the 2008 IPA booklet, 'How public service advertising works', Wood said the ROI on public service cases is much higher than in the private sector.

Woodford also highlighted teacher recruitment, claiming the campaign paid for itself between 110 and 150 times over, with an estimated payback of £665.4m through recruiting 7766 teachers.

Lund (right) argued: 'Change4Life is a bargain if it is helping prevent a problem that costs
the NHS £4bn a year, (and is projected to) cost £15bn in 20 years' time. Of all the levers that government can pull, advertising remains one of the cheapest.'

 

OPPOSING THE MOTION

Matthew Sinclair, director, Taxpayers' Alliance

Matt Tee, former permanent secretary for government communication

Sinclair's contention was that government advertising was a 'huge deadbeat cost'. He added that it rarely reaches the right audience, and even when it does is rarely effective.

He poured scorn on the effectiveness measurements used for government advertising, questioning whether they proved that money is saved. The private sector was 'more rigorous' when it came to ROI, he added.

Sinclair cited campaigns where he felt the cost-benefit analysis was doubtful, including the tax-reminder ads featuring Moira Stewart, and anti-smoking campaigns. 'Anti-smoking advertising is not a bad thing, but it is difficult to estimate what smoking costs the NHS. If anti-smoking messages save money in the short term, more money will be required if people live longer,' he said.

'Advertising can be effective in making small changes but it is less effective in addressing behaviour that will actually save money,' he claimed.

Tee (right) said that before the coalition came to power some campaigns were based on 'poor insight and had very soft outcome measures'.

'Government was so bad at buying and measuring advertising that it could not know whether it saves the country money,' he added.

Debate report by Phyllis Vangelder

OUTCOME: MOTION CARRIED.

Discussion

Before commenting please read our rules for commenting on articles.

If you see a comment you find offensive, you can flag it as inappropriate. In the top right-hand corner of an individual comment, you will see 'flag as inappropriate'. Clicking this prompts us to review the comment. For further information see our rules for commenting on articles.

comments powered by Disqus
Brand Republic Jobs

subscribe now

Latest

Lynx tells men not to leave love to fate
HBO captures awkwardness of watching sex scenes with parents
Primark to open first US stores with Boston chosen as flagship location
Marketing spend on the up but a reality check is needed before celebrating
Top 10 ads of the week: Jackpotjoy and BT Broadband fend off Kevin Bacon
Lidl beats Tesco to 10m Facebook fans
Center Parcs ad banned for encouraging parents to take kids out of school
Coca-Cola, Cadbury and Amazon named top brands for targeting youth market
Leaked document shows Nokia to be rebranded as Microsoft Mobile
Nike lays-off hardware staff in move that casts doubt on future of FuelBand
Greenpeace says save the bees or humans will die
What brands need to know about changes to VAT and online downloads in 2015
Jimmy Savile victims urged to claim compensation in new ad campaign
UKIP launches biggest  ad campaign and stirs up 'racist' accusations
Apple boss Tim Cook provides voiceover on ad touting firm's renewed green commitments
John Lewis walks consumers through its history to celebrate 150 years of business
Waitrose boosts content strategy with 'Weekend Kitchen with Waitrose' C4 tie-up
Hottest virals: Cute puppies star in Pedigree ad, plus Idris Elba and Fruyo
Amnesty International burns candles to illuminate new hope
Toyota achieves the impossible by calming angry Roman drivers
Tom of Finland's 'homoerotic' drawings made into stamps
YouTube reveals user habits to appeal to 'older' marketers
Ex-M&S marketing chief Steven Sharp consulting at WPP
Wolff Olins reveals new CEO after Apple poaches Karl Heiselman
Glasgow offers £30,000 prize to best digital idea for 2014 Commonwealth Games
Google's revenues surge but shares drop as it grapples with transition to mobile
Facebook beats Twitter to most 'marketing friendly' social media site crown, says DMA
Fableists believe children like Finn should be outdoors enjoying life
Homebase, Baileys and Camelot join the line-up at Media360
MasterCard renews Rugby World Cup sponsorship to push cashless message