Apple denies ebook price fixing in 'bizarre' antitrust case

IBooks: Apple accused in the US of colluding to fix ebook prices
IBooks: Apple accused in the US of colluding to fix ebook prices

Apple appeared in court yesterday at the start of a three-week trial in which it stands accused of colluding with major book publishers to fix ebook prices, following its entry to the market in 2010.

The antitrust case has been brought by the US Department of Justice (DoJ), which filed its case against Apple and book publishers Hachette, HarperCollins, Holtzbrinck, Simon & Schuster and Penguin in April 2012.

Apple is the sole defendant to go to trial after all five publishers reached out-of-court settlements with the DoJ, in which they agreed to eliminate prohibitions on wholesale discounts and to pay a collective $164m (£107m) to benefit customers.

According to the government's opening statement, delivered by DoJ co-counsel Lawrence Butterman, Apple participated in and facilitated a plot to fix ebook prices and eliminate market competition.

The evidence against Apple consists of a string of emails and phone calls between Apple senior vice-president of internet software and services, Eddy Cue, and representatives of the five publishers, excerpts of which have been published in a series of slides on the DoJ website.

Apple's lead attorney, Orin Snyder, denied any wrongdoing on Apple's part, branding the government's case "bizarre", adding that every indicator of market health had improved following Apple's entry in 2010 with the launch of the iPad and the iBookstore.

He went on to accuse the DoJ of "trying to reverse engineer a conspiracy from market effect".

Cue's testimony, which is scheduled to be heard on 13 June, will be the critical moment in the non-jury trial, which will also hear testimony from senior Apple executives, including CEO Tim Cook.

The US government is not seeking damages in the case. However, if it is found guilty, Apple could face damages in separate trials by state attorneys and class action suits from consumers.

Discussion

Before commenting please read our rules for commenting on articles.

If you see a comment you find offensive, you can flag it as inappropriate. In the top right-hand corner of an individual comment, you will see 'flag as inappropriate'. Clicking this prompts us to review the comment. For further information see our rules for commenting on articles.

comments powered by Disqus
Brand Republic Jobs

subscribe now