Beiersdorf punished over use of airbrushing in Nivea ad

Nivea: ad banned for misleadingly exaggerating the performance of the product
Nivea: ad banned for misleadingly exaggerating the performance of the product

Nivea owner Beiersdorf has been censured by the ad watchdog over airbrushed images, which "exaggerated" the effect which could be achieved using its products.

The print ad (right) for Nivea’s Vital moisturising cream showed two women alongside the line, "Vital anti-age cream – visibly reduced wrinkles, improves firmness and helps prevent age spots".

NiveaNivea admitted it had retouched the image, adding that it "generally did" in its ads, but claimed it had deliberately left a lot of wrinkles around the eyes of the older woman, "respecting the signs of age she exhibited".

The brand said the primary purpose of the post-production work had been to clearly show how a woman aged over 60 could also be "desirable and a role model to which others could aspire".

However, the Advertising Standards Authority cited a lack of scientific evidence demonstrating that moisturisers were able to achieve such results. It concluded that lines and wrinkles on the model’s face had been "dramatically reduced" and, as a result, misleadingly exaggerated the performance of the product.

The ad is not allowed to appear again in its current form, Beiersdorf was warned over its use of post-production techniques.

Retailer Debenhams recently looked to apply pressure of its rivals by banning the airbrushing of its lingerie models. It had already stopped using airbrushing in its swimwear ads, but said that it was extending the ban to all its marketing.


Before commenting please read our rules for commenting on articles.

If you see a comment you find offensive, you can flag it as inappropriate. In the top right-hand corner of an individual comment, you will see 'flag as inappropriate'. Clicking this prompts us to review the comment. For further information see our rules for commenting on articles.

comments powered by Disqus