However, 30% of those surveyed still thought non-sponsor Nike was officially associated with the event, with similar levels of misplaced recognition for MasterCard (25%) and Samsung (20%).
The credit card brand, which has not sponsored the World Cup since 2006, did however experience something of a fall in awareness over the course of the event, after garnering a recognition score of 38% at the start of the tournament.
But the research found that no official partner brand had increased its recognition by more than 5% by the end of the tournament. McDonald’s was the highest climber, with an increase of 5.3%.
GlobalWebIndex surveyed people who watched the competition in the UK, US and Brazil. The research found that sponsor awareness was much higher in the host nation than the other two markets.
Jason Mander, GlobalWebIndex’s head of trends, said: "Real-time, ambush, content and football-related marketing meant a wealth of content-spread across the globe and significantly influenced spectators’ brand awareness and reactions.
"Consequently, it became more difficult for consumers to differentiate between official sponsors and competitors. Interestingly though, it seems that overall sponsorship recognition comes from long-term associations, which ultimately defies the intense marketing efforts made this year."
The research project involved the firm asking members of its real-time panels in the UK, US and Brazil to identify sponsors.
Respondents were asked to pick official World Cup sponsors from a list of 38 brands, both official sponsors and their non-sponsor rivals.