Editorial: Who are ya?

The news that Charlton Athletic's new shirt sponsor is to be Llanera SL proves that Premiership Football really is a game of two halves. Draw a line under the current top 10 clubs and you will find sponsors that you have actually heard of, including Chelsea (Samsung), Liverpool (Carlsberg) and Arsenal (02).

From the relegation zone up to mid-table obscurity, where Charlton currently languishes, the partnerships include Everton and Chang Beer, Aston Villa with DWS, and Portsmouth and OKI Printing Solutions. Admittedly it is an imprecise science, but so too is the whole business of sports sponsorship.

Charlton will be relieved to have plugged the financial hole left when previous sponsor All:Sports went into administration. Beyond that, the explanatory niceties being uttered by both sides do not really stack up.

Llanera is a Spanish property and town-planning company that apparently shares the same strong sense of community commitment as Charlton. The real reason for its sponsorship, as mentioned only in the open letter to Charlton supporters, is that the company is shortly to open an office in Maidstone, Kent. In the world of sponsorship it is a bit passe, but putting your name to a local team that can play a bit, with all the associated benefits of corporate hospitality, works. Llanera has previously tested this approach by sponsoring its local Spanish team, Valencia FC.

Charlton supporters, like those of most other teams, won't be interested in the sponsor's activities as long as the club has the money to buy new players, or in the rare occurrence that they should need to boycott something.

This disinterest is a rarely documented phenomenon of modern sports sponsorship; the harder a club and sponsor try to find and explain the synergies in a partnership, the more deafeningly silent is the fans' disinterest. Even in an era of active consumer ad avoidance, the chasm between team sponsor and core audience is so yawning it is virtually asleep.

For this reason we should not be surprised or disappointed that Premiership football teams have become global corporate equity, to be held or disposed of depending on the current value of the stock in a most volatile market.

Vodafone's decision to dump Manchester United in favour of a wider tie-up with the Champions League looks as appropriately dispassionate as its early review of its deal with the also underperforming Ferrari Formula One team.

Equally, Chang Beer's tenuous connections with Everton matter little - the shirt sponsorship was available this year and it was a good channel through which to reach a mass of Asian viewers of Premiership football.

It was the same for Samsung's deal with Chelsea, only bigger.

There may be no room for sentiment, but there should always be room for questions about relevance, price and return on investment. Despite the best efforts of sponsorship agencies and rights holders to justify the value of these deals, their real contribution to corporate profitability remains unquantified - and certainly unexplained to investors.

Manchester United is putting a brave face on its split with Vodafone, and claims it will be able to top the record £9m a year price tag paid last time around. The smart money, if you can call it that, is on an Asian giant with a global agenda and little local relevance.


Before commenting please read our rules for commenting on articles.

If you see a comment you find offensive, you can flag it as inappropriate. In the top right-hand corner of an individual comment, you will see 'flag as inappropriate'. Clicking this prompts us to review the comment. For further information see our rules for commenting on articles.

comments powered by Disqus
Brand Republic Jobs

subscribe now


Lynx tells men not to leave love to fate
HBO captures awkwardness of watching sex scenes with parents
Primark to open first US stores with Boston chosen as flagship location
Marketing spend on the up but a reality check is needed before celebrating
Top 10 ads of the week: Jackpotjoy and BT Broadband fend off Kevin Bacon
Lidl beats Tesco to 10m Facebook fans
Center Parcs ad banned for encouraging parents to take kids out of school
Coca-Cola, Cadbury and Amazon named top brands for targeting youth market
Leaked document shows Nokia to be rebranded as Microsoft Mobile
Nike lays-off hardware staff in move that casts doubt on future of FuelBand
Greenpeace says save the bees or humans will die
What brands need to know about changes to VAT and online downloads in 2015
Jimmy Savile victims urged to claim compensation in new ad campaign
UKIP launches biggest  ad campaign and stirs up 'racist' accusations
Apple boss Tim Cook provides voiceover on ad touting firm's renewed green commitments
John Lewis walks consumers through its history to celebrate 150 years of business
Waitrose boosts content strategy with 'Weekend Kitchen with Waitrose' C4 tie-up
Hottest virals: Cute puppies star in Pedigree ad, plus Idris Elba and Fruyo
Amnesty International burns candles to illuminate new hope
Toyota achieves the impossible by calming angry Roman drivers
Tom of Finland's 'homoerotic' drawings made into stamps
YouTube reveals user habits to appeal to 'older' marketers
Ex-M&S marketing chief Steven Sharp consulting at WPP
Wolff Olins reveals new CEO after Apple poaches Karl Heiselman
Glasgow offers £30,000 prize to best digital idea for 2014 Commonwealth Games
Google's revenues surge but shares drop as it grapples with transition to mobile
Facebook beats Twitter to most 'marketing friendly' social media site crown, says DMA
Fableists believe children like Finn should be outdoors enjoying life
Homebase, Baileys and Camelot join the line-up at Media360
MasterCard renews Rugby World Cup sponsorship to push cashless message