Andrew Walmsley on digital: Google is clouding agency probity

From time to time, Google likes to remind us that it is a technology company, rather than a media one. While it admits to being in the advertising business - 99% of Google's revenue comes from ads - chief executive Eric Schmidt says: 'That doesn't make us a media company. We don't do our own content - we get you to someone else's content faster.'

Setting aside the nonsense of this position - many broadcasters haven't produced their own content for years, but are still media companies - this outlook does manifest itself in Google's attitude to advertisers.

Quite rightly, Google's priority is its audience. Look after that, it reasons, and the ad revenue will follow. So why is the company running around in circles trying to induce agencies to spend money with it, when its model is so successful?

For 2007, Google has announced that it will continue its Best Practice Funding (BPF) scheme - a rebate paid to agencies for spending money with it. This is distributed only to agencies over a certain size, not direct advertisers, and is tiered, based on their spend with Google in a given quarter.

The official line from the company's Googleplex HQ in California is that BPF is for agencies, not clients, and that it aims to encourage the former to invest in services to support search. Second, replacing agency commission with BPF creates a level playing-field for all search advertisers.

However, most agencies are contractually obliged to pass media discounts on to their clients, so BPF doesn't reward them. For agencies that keep the rebate, meanwhile, it is an inducement to spend money on Google to generate these payments, rather than a reflection on the merit of the channel.

Creating a level playing-field in search is a worthy objective, and Google's abolition of agency commission makes sense in this respect. Agencies are paid by their clients - commission is allowed for in that agreement, anyway. But what Google has done is to replace a simple discrepancy in the market (some got 15%, others nothing) with a complex and inconsistent one. Customers now get varying percentages - and some still get nothing. So the playing-field is no more level than it was before.

This complexity has another consequence. BPF has created a forecasting headache for agencies and advertisers. Most can't predict with certainty at the beginning of the quarter what they will have spent by the end. The rebate is paid two months after the quarter has ended, so if advertisers want to reinvest it, they have two options: they can estimate the amount they will receive, and risk overspending, or wait for their rebate before making a decision. Many opt to wait, and find that their priorities have changed. Sometimes, they will reinvest in Google, but often they will spend it on something else, or keep it.

Media has, in recent years, made huge strides in creating transparency for advertisers, so BPF represents a retrograde step, as it is not only untransparent, but also anti-transparent. As agency groups aggregate their spend across Europe, a client of one in London would have to be able to audit spend on Google out of the Milan office - perhaps even of a different media network in the same group - to know that it is getting its fair share.

Nobody is suggesting that an agency group would attempt to short-change its clients. Rather, the problem is that Google has put in place a scheme that mitigates against transparency, undermining agencies' ability to demonstrate probity.

Google is set to be the fourth-biggest media company, by revenue, this year. It is an incredibly effective channel, which is why it is so perplexing that it feels the need to induce agencies to spend with it. It might not regard itself as a media company, but advertisers see it that way - and Google should face that responsibility.

- Andrew Walmsley is co-founder of i-level

- Google recently purchased online video-sharing site YouTube for $1.65bn (£833m).

- According to the Internet Advertising Bureau, the web accounts for more than 10% of advertising expenditure, up from 7.2% last year.

- Google is expected to overtake TV channels as the UK's biggest recipient of advertising revenue within a couple of years.

- It posted a UK revenue of £373m in the first half of 2006 and is set to generate £824m for the year, overtaking Channel 4 on £800m.

- Google is predicted to make £1.19bn in 2007 and £1.49bn in 2008.

- In comparison, ITV, the UK's biggest earner from advertising, can expect a revenue of £1.3-£1.4bn in 2007 and 2008.

- ITV1 accounted for about 90% of the group's £1.63bn advertising revenue last year. But revenues at the channel fell 8% in the first six months of 2006.


Before commenting please read our rules for commenting on articles.

If you see a comment you find offensive, you can flag it as inappropriate. In the top right-hand corner of an individual comment, you will see 'flag as inappropriate'. Clicking this prompts us to review the comment. For further information see our rules for commenting on articles.

comments powered by Disqus
Brand Republic Jobs

subscribe now


John Lewis walks consumers through its history to celebrate 150 years of business
Waitrose boosts content strategy with 'Weekend Kitchen with Waitrose' C4 tie-up
Hottest virals: Cute puppies star in Pedigree ad, plus Idris Elba and Fruyo
Amnesty International burns candles to illuminate new hope
Toyota achieves the impossible by calming angry Roman drivers
Tom of Finland's 'homoerotic' drawings made into stamps
YouTube reveals user habits to appeal to 'older' marketers
Ex-M&S marketing chief Steven Sharp consulting at WPP
Wolff Olins reveals new CEO after Apple poaches Karl Heiselman
Glasgow offers £30,000 prize to best digital idea for 2014 Commonwealth Games
Google's revenues surge but shares drop as it grapples with transition to mobile
Facebook beats Twitter to most 'marketing friendly' social media site crown, says DMA
Fableists believe children like Finn should be outdoors enjoying life
Homebase, Baileys and Camelot join the line-up at Media360
MasterCard renews Rugby World Cup sponsorship to push cashless message
Lynx unleashes £9m 'Peace invasion' campaign
Social Brands 100 Youth: Pizza Hut most social youth brand in UK
Cheryl Cole is wild and arresting in new L'Oreal work
Morrisons told not to show alcohol ads during YouTube nursery rhymes
O2 head of brand Shadi Halliwell departs after 23 years at company in restructure
Tesco hit by further sales decline as it turns to digital Clubcard and social network
Branding guru Wally Olins dies aged 83
Duracell short film captures epic Transatlantic voyage
Ash runs Tinder experiment to show smokers are less desirable to opposite sex
British Airways teams up with Gerry Cottle Jnr for summer of rooftop film screenings
Arklu says 'girls can be superheroes too' with doll design competition
Coke enters squash market with Oasis Mighty Drops
Virgin Galactic signs up Land Rover as space flight sponsor
Motorola marketer Andrew Morley departs as Google gears up for sale to Lenovo
US Airways apologises after tweeting obscene image at a customer